Francesco Poli wrote:
In the KDE+Qt example, the recipient is allowed to port the KDE library
to a toolkit other than Qt. If the chosen toolkit is licensed under a
more permissive license than the GPL (e.g.: LGPL, Expat, 3-clause BSD,
Excellent answer. I also realized that if a person has a co
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:50:06 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
> Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > But I don't understand what is the meaning of licensing something
> > under the LGPL if it is effectively under the GPL anyway because it
> > uses a GPL-ed library.
>
> Because it also a
Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
>
> says that a work using a GPL-ed library can be licensed under the
> LGPL "if you convert to GPL". For example the KDE libraries which
> use the GPL-ed Qt libraries are themselve
Hello.
The matrix under
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
says that a work using a GPL-ed library can be licensed under the LGPL
"if you convert to GPL". For example the KDE libraries which use the
GPL-ed Qt libraries are themselves licensed under the LGPL.
4 matches
Mail list logo
