Re: License of Emacs modes

2003-06-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Err, I thought the license of interpreted programs had to be > > compatible with the license of interpreters > > I don't think so. You are right. There answer is there: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InterpreterIncompat > > No, e

Re: License of Emacs modes

2003-06-04 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En réponse à Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped > > > under a GPL-compatible license? > > > > Pretty much. It is possibl

Re: License of Emacs modes

2003-06-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped > > under a GPL-compatible license? > > Pretty much. It is possible to write stand-alone elisp code that only > uses Emacs i

Re: License of Emacs modes

2003-06-04 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped > under a GPL-compatible license? Pretty much. It is possible to write stand-alone elisp code that only uses Emacs internals. At that point you are okay, treating Emacs has an interp

License of Emacs modes

2003-06-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, Since Emacsen are GPL-licensed, do Emacs modes have to be shipped under a GPL-compatible license? I discovered one of them which could be problematic. Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant