On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:24AM -0500, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> | What is needed here is a license exemption from the freeswan copyright
> | holders, granting permission to distribute binaries linked against
> | libdes.
> Is this enough ? Because of the advertising clause, would Debian be
> forc
Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Freeswan (the user space daemon and the kernel module) needs Eric Young's
> libdes to work.
I know from researching for mindterm that version 3.06 of Eric Young's
libdes (from 1993) was licensed under the GPL. I don't know how much the
libdes library has changed since then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| Which parts of freeswan link against libdes? According to
| /usr/share/doc/freeswan/copyright, some parts are LGPL. Do we know for
| sure that libdes+GPL is happening?
No, not for sure. However, since the copyright situation
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> The reason why freeswan can currently not go into main is an issue with some
> code license that is bundled with it. I am struggling with this for quite
> some time now and at the moment I need some help to clarify it
> Frees
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 13:23:28 +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Freeswan upstream developers are currently thinking of switch to openssl.
> I already pointed out to them that this might need a change in their own
> (GPL) license statement so that linking to openssl is explicitly allowed.
Perhaps y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
The reason why freeswan can currently not go into main is an issue with some
code license that is bundled with it. I am struggling with this for quite
some time now and at the moment I need some help to clarify it
Freeswan (the user spa
6 matches
Mail list logo
