Hi,
On 25 May 2017 at 02:51, Paul Wise wrote:
> Personally I would like to see the amount of proprietary nVidia stuff
> in Debian reduced, not increased. I would suggest focussing your
> efforts on OpenCL/Vulkan based and open source deep learning libraries
> instead of proprietary stuff that on
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Personally I would like to see the amount of proprietary nVidia stuff
> in Debian reduced, not increased. I would suggest focussing your
> efforts on OpenCL/Vulkan based and open source deep learning libraries
> instead of proprietary stuff that
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:42 PM, lumin wrote:
> Hi Debian Legal Team,
debian-legal are not Debian's legal advisors, just a bunch of people
subscribed to a mailing list.
> I intend to package[1] a proprietary deep learning
> library named "cuDNN"[2], which is definitely useful
> to deep learning
Subject: License Issue about Distributing NVIDIA's cuDNN library via Debian
Hi Debian Legal Team,
I intend to package[1] a proprietary deep learning library named "cuDNN"[2],
which is definitely useful to deep learning researchers.
@lyeager kindly provided some help[3] on this but
Hi Debian Legal Team,
I intend to package[1] a proprietary deep learning
library named "cuDNN"[2], which is definitely useful
to deep learning researchers.
@lyeager kindly provided some help[3] on this but I'm
not really good at these legal terms.
Generally, to download the cudnn library, one ne
5 matches
Mail list logo
