Remco Seesink wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Licening issues resolved! Thanks all.
>
> Cheers,
> Remco.
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:39:00 -0400
> From: "Brent Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Remco Seesink&quo
Hello,
Licening issues resolved! Thanks all.
Cheers,
Remco.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:39:00 -0400
From: "Brent Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Remco Seesink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Licening ibwebadmin and JSRS
Th
Hello,
How about this:
Both options don't require you to change anything about the rest of the
software you distribute. The problem is solved if you reply, pick an
option and give permission to use the software and future version under
the license of choice.
First option: Dual licensing under th
>What exactly is this trying to require? I can see several things:
>
>1) You may not change the license on this code. This is a no-op;
> I have no standing to do that.
>
>2) You may not bring legal action to stop others' use of this code.
> For example, you may not sue for patent infringement.
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Why not just point him at the smallest possible BSD-style license:
>
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> are met:
> 1. Redistributions of source code must retain th
On Jul 1, 2004, at 14:48, Remco Seesink wrote:
The only thing you can't do is to restrict anyone else from using it
however
they see fit. You may not change the rules I have set on how it can
be used.
What exactly is this trying to require? I can see several things:
1) You may not
Why not just point him at the smallest possible BSD-style license:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list o
Remco Seesink wrote:
> Great news, The author of JSRS agreed to a license change. I want to get it
> right now the first try, so I thought I better check here first.
Good idea.
> How about this version where I removed the offending line?
>
>
> No Nonsense Copyright and License for JSRS JavaScri
satisfy your
every need.
==
email inquiries: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the e-mail from the author.
From: "Brent Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Remco Seesink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Lutz Brückner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Licening ibwebadmi
On 2004-06-28 23:39:57 +0100 Remco Seesink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
however they see fit. You may not copyright it yourself or change
the
rules I have
^
set on how it can be used.
[...] It appears to deny me the right to
assert copyright i
Hello,
I am replying to a message from some time ago. This is the original thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00797.html
>On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:09:52AM +0200, Remco Seesink wrote:
>> Copyright:
>>
>> This JSRS stuff was written by me. I find it useful. Others find it
11 matches
Mail list logo
