Re: Licence and copyright for autogenerated files (gtk-vim-syntax)

2007-03-27 Thread Ben Finney
Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Copying: I hereby waive any potential rights on the syntax files. I > am not sure whether a list of library symbols can be copyrighted at > all. But this world is full of lawyers with the silliest ideas. The > ideal state (which would solve all

Re: Licence and copyright for autogenerated files (gtk-vim-syntax)

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 3/28/07, Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By reading this I'm tempted to think that these files belong to the public domain. Could the name of functions and parameters owned by someone? Who must I credit for these files and under which licence? What do you think? I'd say they

Licence and copyright for autogenerated files (gtk-vim-syntax)

2007-03-27 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, I'm currently making a package for gtk-vim-syntax (ITP[1]). The files in this package are auto-generated by a script (the script is in the public domain). This excerpt comes from the README: 8<== Copying: I hereby waive any potential rights on the syntax files. I am not sure