Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Jan Luca Naumann wrote: > The best thing should be to ask the upstream author to replace the file, > shouldn't it? The other option is to contact the author of the Dr. Dobb's article, whose email address is at the end of the article: http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/lo

Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's

Yeah, this was my thought, too, since I found no permission to use this file in a project. The best thing should be to ask the upstream author to replace the file, shouldn't it? Jan Am 1. Juni 2016 00:57:43 MESZ, schrieb Riley Baird : >On Tue, 31 May 2016 23:51:52 +0200 >Jan Luca Naumann wro

Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's

On Tue, 31 May 2016 23:51:52 +0200 Jan Luca Naumann wrote: > Hey, > > I want to package the tool sedutil > (https://github.com/Drive-Trust-Alliance/sedutil). > > When writing the debian/copyright file I found a possible file that > could be problematic to be used together with GPL-3 code: > htt

Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's

Hey, I want to package the tool sedutil (https://github.com/Drive-Trust-Alliance/sedutil). When writing the debian/copyright file I found a possible file that could be problematic to be used together with GPL-3 code: https://github.com/Drive-Trust-Alliance/sedutil/blob/master/Common/log.h Is thi