Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-27 Thread Tommi Mäkitalo
Am Sonntag, 27. August 2006 18:17 schrieb Francesco Poli: > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:19:18 +0300 Markus Laire wrote: > > [...] > > > If no, then why would the author want to use LGPL if nobody can use > > the tntdb under that license? > > So that a modified tntdb that links against other libraries (u

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:19:18 +0300 Markus Laire wrote: [...] > So LGPLed tntdb would be *distributable* by others. > But would it be *usable* by others in his/her own program under the > LGPL license? Only as long as it does not link against GPLed library. Otherwise, you have to consider it as if

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > > If you are saying that LGPL:ed tntdb would be distributable as > > long as nobody uses it under the LGPL license, but only under the > > GPL license, then I think I do understand. This would only be the case if it was forming a derivative work of a GP

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Kari Pahula
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:55:45PM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > This means, that it wouldn't be possible to create e.g. a program, which > accesses a mysql- and a postgresql-database at the same time? Creating such a program and distributing it in source form would be ok. With binary, I think

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Tommi Mäkitalo
... > > If you are saying that LGPL:ed tntdb would be distributable as long as > nobody uses it under the LGPL license, but only under the GPL license, > then I think I do understand. > > But I think that the original poster wanted to allow usage of tntdb > under the LGPL license (why else would he

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Markus Laire
On 8/26/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:18:00 +0300 Markus Laire wrote: > On 8/26/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote: [...] > > > Because according to your interpretation I would be able to use > > > *any*

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 14:18:00 +0300 Markus Laire wrote: > On 8/26/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote: [...] > > > Because according to your interpretation I would be able to use > > > *any* GPL:ed library using the terms of LGPL with this simple

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Markus Laire
On 8/26/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote: > On 8/25/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >No; the LGPL is always compatible with the GPL. [You can always > >remove the LGPL from code licensed under it and redistribute it > >under the G

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Tommi Mäkitalo
Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 14:15 schrieb Kari Pahula: > (With apologies to Tommi if he's subscribed to -legal already.) > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:47:49AM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > > Hi, > > ... > > While there would be a problem if a program were to link to both > OpenSSL library (via, s

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Markus Laire wrote: > On 8/25/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >No; the LGPL is always compatible with the GPL. [You can always > >remove the LGPL from code licensed under it and redistribute it > >under the GPL.] > > Are you sure? Yes. Allow me to quote from t

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-26 Thread Markus Laire
On 8/25/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > I would like to change the license to LGPL. The problem here is, > that the mysql-driver links with mysql, which is GPL. Does this GPL > of mysql mean, that tntdb needs to be GPL also? You didn't s

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > I would like to change the license to LGPL. The problem here is, > that the mysql-driver links with mysql, which is GPL. Does this GPL > of mysql mean, that tntdb needs to be GPL also? No; the LGPL is always compatible with the GPL. [You can always remo

Re: LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-25 Thread Kari Pahula
(With apologies to Tommi if he's subscribed to -legal already.) On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:47:49AM +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the author of tntdb - a C++ class library for easy database access, which I'm the DD who just uploaded it to the archive - I won't say "the maintainer" u

LGPL-library (tntdb) linked with GPL-library (mysql)

2006-08-25 Thread Tommi Mäkitalo
Hi, I'm the author of tntdb - a C++ class library for easy database access, which is on the list of prospective packages for debian. Currently the license is GPL with this famous openssl-clause, because a part of it (the postgresql-driver) links against postgresql-libraries, which link against