>3. If User breaches any term of this license or commences an
>infringement action against any copyright holder then the User's
^^^
Sloppy and overbroad. This should refer to any holder of copyright in *this
Software*, at the very least
Dear Ben and Others:
Thank you for your constructive feedback regarding the draft version of
the new JasPer license. Your responses have been most helpful. I have
explained the problem associated with clause 3 (the
litigation-terminates-license clause) to Image Power, and the company
has indicat
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, MJ Ray wrote:
> There is no "X11 license" certified by OSI. What do you mean here?
I am sorry, I meant the MIT License which is essentially the same
license used by the X Consortium for X11
(http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html).
--Michael
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:21:13AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > This disclaimer is much better.
>
> I can't read it. May I suggest M-x downcase-region?
Lawyers can't write disclaimers using lower case letters. It's a
medical problem.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
:
Scripsit "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 3. If User breaches any term of this license or commences an
> > infringement action against any copyright holder then the User's
> > license and all sublicenses that have been granted hereunder by User to
> > other parties shall terminate.
> I
On 2004-01-30 02:50:32 + Michael Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, the new license was largely copied from the open-source-certified
X11 license.
There is no such thing as "open-source-certified" that I know of.
There is no "X11 license" certified by OSI. What do you mean here?
wdif
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Michael Adams wrote:
> I have some potentially good news. Image Power seems to be agreeable
> to revising the JasPer software license to address the concerns raised
> by you and other members of the open-source community. I have appended
> the first preli
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Michael Adams wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> [I have tried to include everyone that was involved in the discussions
> on the JasPer software license on the distribution list for this
> email. Quite a number of people were involved. I hope that I did not
> miss a
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:50:32PM -0800, Michael Adams wrote:
> I have some potentially good news. Image Power seems to be agreeable
> to revising the JasPer software license to address the concerns raised
> by you and other members of the open-source community. I have appended
> the first preli
Hi Folks:
[I have tried to include everyone that was involved in the discussions
on the JasPer software license on the distribution list for this
email. Quite a number of people were involved. I hope that I did not
miss anybody.]
I have some potentially good news. Image Power seems to be agree
10 matches
Mail list logo