On 2000-05-24 at 23:22 -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Replies to this message should move to debian-legal.]
I have dropped debian-devel as a recipient.
> However, the BXA regulations were later amended[2]. I haven't read through
> all the changes, but we might presume with some caution that
[Replies to this message should move to debian-legal.]
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 09:48:38PM -0400, Mike Bilow wrote:
> You are also right in saying that the crypto in the Debian non-US tree
> might well fall within the new rules and be legally exportable to most of
> the world, but there is still a
Simon Richter wrote:
> Anyone who is a lawyer or knows one care to check this? We're still
> talking about a gpg frontend, which will not have any general plugins --
> just crypto ones.
>
I'll check into it in more detail when I get back from a business trip
(Thursday). Does someone need the ans
On 19 May 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
> It *used* to be that hooks explicitly for crypto-support were caught
> by the BXA; you needed a general purpose help/plug-in framework to be
> OK.
> The recent rewrite of the regs may have relaxed this. IANAL.
Anyone who is a lawyer or knows one care to ch
> "Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Are you sure about that? I remember something about programs
>> providing the necessary hooks to insert encryption software to
>> be restricted too.
Julian> debian-legal, anyone know the answer to this one?
It *used* to
In debian.legal, you wrote:
>I'm 99% sure that if the program doesn't contain encryption software
>that it is okay. The Export Control Laws don't say anything about
>"hooks" or the like. The demarcation line is whether or not it
>contains encryption code. No encryption code, no problem -- hooks
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 03:22:19AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > > The program is not encumbered by encryption laws, so it doesn't need
> to go
> > > > into non-US.
> >
> > Are you sure about that? I remember something about programs providing
> the
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 03:22:19AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> > > The program is not encumbered by encryption laws, so it doesn't need to go
> > > into non-US.
>
> Are you sure about that? I remember something about programs providing the
> necessary hooks to insert encryption software to be re
8 matches
Mail list logo
