* Roberto Gordo Saez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060909 11:22]:
> But there is something I do not understand. Why "this list" is not the
> place to put disagreements on the way legal issues are handled?
There is nothing wrong with discussing legal issues in debian-legal, try
to get a common understanding
On 9/5/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Markus Laire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 15:01]:
> This problem was mentioned in this list on _2004_ but cdrtools still
> hasn't been removed from Debian (see [2]). IMHO "hypocrisy" is perfect
> word to describe such behaviour.
"This list" is
* Markus Laire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 15:01]:
> I have somewhat similar feelings after I found out that the
> "cdrtools"-package[1] included in Debian isn't DFSG-free, but is still
> included in main.
>
> (Even worse, its license might even be illegal because it's GPLv2 +
> incombatible restr
On 8/31/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Markus Laire said:
> So they've been doing this for 2 years, and have included
> non-DFSG-free cdrtools in main while doing so? They even shipped Sarge
> with this known non-DFSG-free package in main?
>
> IMHO cdrtoo
This one time, at band camp, Markus Laire said:
> On 8/31/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Markus Laire writes:
> >>I used to believe that Debian only included legal, DFSG-free software
> >>in main, but "cdrtools" fiasco seems to prove that I was wrong.
> >
> >Ever since the issue i
Markus Laire writes:
>On 8/31/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In the end, those same maintainers
>> have given up on that as a lost cause and instead have started work on
>> a free cdrtools fork that will ship in etch instead of cdrtools.
>
>Do you have any link/source to support
On 8/31/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Laire writes:
>I have somewhat similar feelings after I found out that the
>"cdrtools"-package[1] included in Debian isn't DFSG-free, but is still
>included in main.
>
>(Even worse, its license might even be illegal because it's GPLv2 +
Markus Laire writes:
>On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
>> choosing Debian, because it does not follow my definition of freedom.
>> I would like to urge to change the Social Contract to be clarified
>> t
Markus Laire wrote:
> On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
>> choosing Debian, because it does not follow my definition of freedom.
>> I would like to urge to change the Social Contract to be clarified
>>
On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
choosing Debian, because it does not follow my definition of freedom.
I would like to urge to change the Social Contract to be clarified
this in this case. I'm serious ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
