Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > This license will be considered non-free in Debian. ACK. We have a thread about this on the OSI mailing list as well: http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2013-November/thread.html starting at http://projects.opensource.org/piperma

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-05 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:19:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > The GNU GPL is the appropriate license here, please use it instead of > contributing to license proliferation, as recommended by Debian's > guide for upstreams: As someone who has written Free Software for nearly 20 years, I completely ag

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: >Do you know a license somehow similar in spirit than mine which I could > use? > It would be nice to have something that oblidges 'closed distributions' to > publish > at least their sources as required by some software in RHEL which i

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
Dear Gergely Nagy, Dear members of Debian-legal Do you know a license somehow similar in spirit than mine which I could use? It would be nice to have something that oblidges 'closed distributions' to publish at least their sources as required by some software in RHEL which is what puts the

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Gergely Nagy
Elmar Stellnberger writes: > S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at http://www.elstel.org/license/ > > Having clearly considered your critics I have published a reworked > edition > of S-FSL which should more strictly adhere to the terms of OSS-software. > As you can understand and as I have already partial

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Nick Oosterhof
On Nov 4, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > I'm going to copy this (and bounce the last mail here) to debian-legal. > > Again, I'd like to stress how much I really dislike the idea of another > license written for fun. +1. > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:13:33PM +0100, Elmar Stellnbe

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at http://www.elstel.org/license/ Having clearly considered your critics I have published a reworked edition of S-FSL which should more strictly adhere to the terms of OSS-software. As you can understand and as I have already partially described there are still issues t

Re: Bug#728716: RFS: xchroot/2.3.2-9 [ITP] -- Hi Debian!

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
I'm going to copy this (and bounce the last mail here) to debian-legal. Again, I'd like to stress how much I really dislike the idea of another license written for fun. Thanks for your work, Paul On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:13:33PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > > S-FSL v1.3.3 uploaded at

Hi debian-legal

2008-04-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear, debian-legal Memsaab celebrated its first birthday recently. As Memsaab enters the second year of its existence, we feel extremely proud and joyous to share a few things with our visitors. As you have probably already seen, Memsaab has donned a whole new look. Memsaab.com , the face

Anthony says Hi

2006-10-21 Thread Hess, Anthony
Our educational counselors are recruiting new people for our home degree program. We are running this program as an experiment and we feel you may qualify. This program will earn you a fully qualified degree, with transcripts. Currently we are recruiting people with vast knowledge or experienc

Re: Hi, regarding debian trademark

2006-05-30 Thread Gene Rhim
Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:51:16PM -0700, Gene Rhim wrote:> Hi,>> I was referred to you by Martin regarding the debian trademark. I am looking I'm sorry, you'll have to be more specific.  We have a lot of peoplenamed "Martin".> to sell debian online and donate a portion o

Hi, regarding debian trademark

2006-05-30 Thread Gene Rhim
Hi, I was referred to you by Martin regarding the debian trademark. I am looking to sell debian online and donate a portion of the earnings to debian.org through one of the non-profits associated with it. I need to know if there is any trademark restrictions that would prevent me from using a

Re: Hi to All!

2006-01-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
On 1/28/06, INFONOVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! Hi! Educated by Prof. Pedro? regards, alexander.

Hi to All!

2006-01-27 Thread INFONOVA
Hi! I'm happy to join this list Greetings to all! Leonardo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hi

2005-07-26 Thread metacolo Anonymizing Remailer
This message is being sent to you automatically in response to an email that you sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Most likely, you tried to reply to an email that has been sent through this service. If you did not send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, please ignore this message. The metacolo Anonymiz

Hi there you.

2005-06-18 Thread July Peck
Hi there sweety, It is Julie from the web dating service. I have been reading all about you and I just wanted to say hola. I have a internet site I want you to see where you can see all about me and see what I look like too. Im looking sooo forward to talking to you soon cutey. Cya later baby

Abwesenheitsnotiz: Hi

2004-10-24 Thread Riegert, Ulrich
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren Am 28. Oktober 2004 bin ich wieder im Hause. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Dr. Strüh Tel.: 07164/930173 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mit freundlichen Grüßen U. Riegert

Hi, there is a discussion in the German Wikipedia whether the Debian Open Use Logo may be subjected to the GFDL. The German Wikipedia does not accept any content not licensed as public domain or GFDL (e. g. no "fair use" because this is an American law only). > This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the > Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project As far as I understand this sentence, the logo may not be used for other things and is not "free" according to the GFDL. The "possible copyright violation notice", however, was removed by the uploader today.

2004-09-21 Thread Hendrik Brummermann
; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, there is a discussion in the German Wikipedia whether the Debian Open Use Logo <http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Debian_logo.png> may be subjected to the GFDL. The German Wikipedia does not accept any content not licensed as public domain o

Re: Re: Hi [#1316782]

2004-03-19 Thread ebaycounters
Hello, **IMPORTANT*** If this information does not answer your question, please hit reply and send. There is no need to retype your question

Hi !

2003-07-21 Thread JRBurnley
Title: ai fammi sognare ai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non posso aspettare Succhiami così leggermente ancora ... ancora di più ... di più Mi sento umida Toccami! Mmmhh...dai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non po