Apache License v2.0 section 4.4 also allows somebody to make a trivial
change to the covered source code and require notice "wherever such
third-party notices normally appear"; "You may add Your own attribution
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an
addendum to the
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012, at 07:41 PM, Felyza Wishbringer wrote:
> My biggest concern is that since it allows for small modifications,
> what would protect us, as the original authors, from someone taking
> our source, modifying a single line, then re-releasing under a
> modified GPLv3 that says that in
/lurker surfacing
Working on a new project with a collaboration team. They are throwing
around GPLv3, Apache, and zlib.
An argument sprang up, which makes me concerned about DFSG-ness of the GPLv3.
The GPLv3 allows for modifications per the license itself. This is
apparent in statements by legal
3 matches
Mail list logo
