Ben Finney wrote:
> "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> personally (IANAL) I'd consider whitespace stripping to be a
>> non-issue. After a change that is trivial for any downstream
>> recipient of the code to make (running the afore-mentioned
>> "indent"), the whitespace-stripped c
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Evan Prodromou wrote:
>
> personally (IANAL) I'd consider whitespace stripping to be a
> non-issue. After a change that is trivial for any downstream
> recipient of the code to make (running the afore-mentioned
> "indent"), the whitespace-stripped
Evan Prodromou wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-30-01 at 11:54 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>> This refrain keeps getting repeated, but still no one has explained
>> how distributing a form of the work which is _not_ the prefered form
>> for modification satisfies section 3 of the GPL:
>
> So, I think we
3 matches
Mail list logo
