Re: GPL and the "system library" exception

2019-03-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 13:17 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Git in Debian actually links (L)GPL-3+ libraries: > > /usr/lib/git-core/git-remote-https links libtasn1.so.6; libtasn1.so.6 > is distributed under non-trivial terms (according to its Debian > copyright file): > > The library is licensed

Re: GPL and the "system library" exception

2019-03-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 10:04 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ansgar Burchardt: > > > People have argued before that this applies to Debian. In that > > case > > Debian wouldn't be able to distribute binaries of GPL-2-only > > programs > > linking against any GPL-3+ runtime libraries like libstdc+

Re: GPL and the "system library" exception

2019-03-21 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ansgar Burchardt: > People have argued before that this applies to Debian. In that case > Debian wouldn't be able to distribute binaries of GPL-2-only programs > linking against any GPL-3+ runtime libraries like libstdc++? Or am I > missing something? Yes, I think we need the system library e

GPL and the "system library" exception

2019-03-21 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Dear debian-legal@, suppose I compile the following trivial GPL-2-only program: +--- | #include | int main() { throw std::exception(); } +--- Then the resulting binary program links (among other things) against libstdc++6, licensed under GPL-3+ with runtime exception. The GPL requires the comp