Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > Well, that's just great for the users who can see the UI without it
> > spewing errors. Was there really no way to offer the same features to
> > everyone in an easily-accessible way?
>
> I don't know; you'd have to ask the designers.
I ha
MJ Ray wrote:
> Well, that's just great for the users who can see the UI without it
> spewing errors. Was there really no way to offer the same features to
> everyone in an easily-accessible way?
I don't know; you'd have to ask the designers. Although you are now
using the word "accessible" when
Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > It's the comment system which is incapable, not the people.
> > IMO there was no good reason to design some people out of it.
>
> If it's possible to provide the same level of function with an interface
> that works in more browsers, great -
MJ Ray wrote:
> It's the comment system which is incapable, not the people.
> IMO there was no good reason to design some people out of it.
If it's possible to provide the same level of function with an interface
that works in more browsers, great - and I believe they did do that as
time went on,
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You've mentioned this on multiple occasions; my offer to populate the
> comment system with any comments that you are unable to make via it
> still stands.
Thank you. I don't recall that. I had hoped FSF would actually fix
their bad processes to give equal opp
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The GPL v3 is not yet released; the FSF are asking for anyone who has
> > concerns to make them known now. [...]
>
> Unfortunately, to make them known, you have to jump through hoops of
> being able to use their anybrowser-bus
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The GPL v3 is not yet released; the FSF are asking for anyone who has
> concerns to make them known now. [...]
Unfortunately, to make them known, you have to jump through hoops of
being able to use their anybrowser-busting web system, persuade their
reject-all emai
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not fully agree with the FSF and the GPL. v2.0 maybe ok,
> but I have complains against the new one.
The GPL v3 is not yet released; the FSF are asking for anyone who has
concerns to make them known now. The draft you've read is *not* what
the f
8 matches
Mail list logo
