Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-06-01 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Henning" == Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Henning> Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> > * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or >> intended for > * use in the de

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-28 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Many thanks to everybody for your responses. As I understand, I'll have to remove this code from argouml or move argouml to non-free... or ask Sun to change their license ;-) Am I right? Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: >

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Or, in other words, it may well fail DFSG #6, because the upstream is very > > likely to be completely unwilling to open themselves up to the lawsuits > > that could result from a criti

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Or, in other words, it may well fail DFSG #6, because the upstream is very > likely to be completely unwilling to open themselves up to the lawsuits > that could result from a critical failure of their software when used in > a safety-critical system where

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > > * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for > > > * use in the design, constructio

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for > > * use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear > > * facility. > This seems to

Re: Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for > * use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear > * facility. This seems to fail DFSG#6: No Discrimination Against Fields of Ende

Fw: [argouml-dev] Licence issue (debian in particular)

2003-05-27 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hello everybody, I am the new maintainer of argouml and I saw the attached message on the dev-mailing-list. They added new sources but with a Sun's License. I think it would be ok to include in Debian but I prefer to ask here (I think it's the best place, isn't it? ;-)). Many thanks for your time