On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 22:23, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:02:40AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 21:34, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > I had been working on cleansing it, but have gotten depressed by the
> > > hostile
> > > response from some of the
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:02:40AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 21:34, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > I had been working on cleansing it, but have gotten depressed by the hostile
> > response from some of the Debian kernel maintainers and the dead silence
> > from upstream.
>
On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 21:34, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I had been working on cleansing it, but have gotten depressed by the hostile
> response from some of the Debian kernel maintainers and the dead silence
> from upstream.
>From memory, there's someone on lkml who has a "list" of the non-free
bit
.jareeN. wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is a really silly/of_topic question.
It's not.
> I am a LFS user and I want to use free Linux kernel for my GNU/Linux
> system, by free I mean which is free from binaries and non-free code.
> Does such a kernel exists ?
>
> I mean s
Sorry if this is a really silly/of_topic question.
I am a LFS user and I want to use free Linux kernel for my GNU/Linux
system, by free I mean which is free from binaries and non-free code.
Does such a kernel exists ?
I mean some kind of patch.
--
``If only matrix was Free Software who
5 matches
Mail list logo