Re: FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-29 Thread Walter Landry
Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also thought about other possible issue - dynamic linking w GPL code. > > I will probably be packaging User Defined Functions for the engine. > They are dynamic libraries, distributed by thrid parties. > Some of them are GPL. Will it be any problem

Re: FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-29 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z pon, 29-04-2002, godz. 00:20, Walter Landry pisze: > Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages > > and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure > > that the packages I create will be D

Re: FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Walter Landry
Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages > and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure > that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. It looks fine. The verbiage about patents is not really fr

FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hello! Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. Of course I've read the license - 3 times, but IANAL and I want to be sure. I attached the copyright file. FireBir