On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> It has no license headers, it is not mentioned in the LICENSE file and
> http://www.emutalk.net/showthread.php?t=45564 seems to indicate that
> mupen64plus developers don't know the license situation either.
> Summary: Orkin (developler of g
> Is there any indication that the glN64 dir is under a different
> license to the rest of the code?
It has no license headers, it is not mentioned in the LICENSE file and
http://www.emutalk.net/showthread.php?t=45564 seems to indicate that
mupen64plus developers don't know the license situation
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
> currently some people started to create a package for mupen64plus. There is a
> complex license situation, but most files are under a free, osi-approved
> license. Only the directory glN64 has files without any license informations
> http:/
Hi,
currently some people started to create a package for mupen64plus. There is a
complex license situation, but most files are under a free, osi-approved
license. Only the directory glN64 has files without any license informations
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/mupen64plus.git;a=blob_plai
4 matches
Mail list logo