Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread Arnoud Engelfriet
Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe > > copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough. > > The only "real" country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly bec

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >When I think about it: Since there is no object code in the >libmail-domainkeys-perl or libmail-dkim-perl binary packages, there shouldn't >be any problems with GPL as far as *these* packages are concerned. Did you notice my answer? I already explained the issue. -- c

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:35:34AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > By the way, are there still a few countries not in the Berne Union? Maybe > copyright isn't completely cross-jurisdiction, but it seems near enough. The only "real" country left is Taiwan, and it's mostly because the rebels in the mainland

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Friday 25 August 2006 01:57, Stephen Gran took the opportunity to say: > So, if the domain keys patent is under active enforcement, this software > probably should not be approved by the ftp masters. If it is not under > active enforcement, and is under a free license, there is no reason not >

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:19, MJ Ray took the opportunity to say: > Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say: > > > I sent a "clarification request" using their feedback form a couple of > > > weeks ago. Still no

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-25 Thread MJ Ray
Not quite contradicting what was written, but it isn't quite so simple... Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > trademarks are a no-op. The DFSG allows for name-change clauses (DFSG 4). > This allows us to modify and redistribute without infringing trademarks > if need be. No freedom issue h

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-24 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Ben Finney said: > Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only > > deals with copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner > > It's quite apparent from reading the DFSG that there's no

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-24 Thread Ben Finney
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only > deals with copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner It's quite apparent from reading the DFSG that there's no such limitation. The DFSG in particular are concerned with

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-24 Thread MJ Ray
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say: > > I sent a "clarification request" using their feedback form a couple of > > weeks ago. Still no reaction (reply or update of their web page). I asked > > if their intention i

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Since DFSG apparently (according to the recent discussion) only deals with >copyright and restrictions imposed by the copyright owner, I assume that >uploading the independently developed Perl packages, libmail-domainkeys-perl >and libmail-dkim-perl, should be possible

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-08-24 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:15, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say: > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:43, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to write: > > On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write: > > > "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > > > >

Re: DomainKeys license(s)

2006-07-27 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:43, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to write: > On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write: > > "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >ib yte.se... > > > > > What about the

Re: DomainKeys license(s) (Re: Hello and request for sponsor (DomainKeys packages))

2006-06-20 Thread Joe Smith
"Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write: "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] yte.se... > What about the statement on http:

DomainKeys license(s) (Re: Hello and request for sponsor (DomainKeys packages))

2006-06-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:02, Joe Smith took the opportunity to write: > "Magnus Holmgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >yte.se... > > > What about the statement on http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys? > > > > "Yahoo!'s DomainKeys Intellectual