Simon pointed out the key question: if it is a derivative work or just
an aggregation of two works (code + logo, or logo + text). I don't think
it would be considered a derivative but IANAL.
Also note that even if the executable was a derivative work of the logo
(and thus subject to the CC-BY-SA
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > "share alike" (thus copyleft) licensing of the entire project, i.e. it
> > would not be available for close-source derivatives?
> The important question is, is the code or documentation legally a
> derivative work of the logo, or have they just been
On 25/02/15 15:55, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Now at least we agreed that logo could be released under CC BY SA
> (share-alike) license but I wondered: if I have a software project
> which is under more permissive license (MIT or BSD-3) and then includes
> that logo a) in the code b) in the doc
Dear IANALs,
I am in a dialog about a license for a logo I once envisioned and then
some proper designed helped to design but because naive me didn't
disclose upfront the terms of the logo release -- got problematic.
Now at least we agreed that logo could be released under CC BY SA
(share-alike)
4 matches
Mail list logo