Re: Definitions of object code [Re: Free Art License]

2004-10-01 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:28:39AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 21:25, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:24:46PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > > I've a number of documents that say "References to "object code" and > > > "executables" in the GNU GPL are to

Definitions of object code [Re: Free Art License]

2004-10-01 Thread Joe Wreschnig
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 21:25, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:24:46PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > How do you feel about specifying what is *not* the preferred form of > > modification ("object code", in GPL parlance)? > > It's likely to cause problems, too. > > > I've a numbe