Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Ben Goodger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Eric Dorland wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Ben,
>> >
>> >
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I'm replying to this including our QA person, Asa Dotzler who is
>> interested in these matters.
> [snip]
>>
>> Asa will comment more here.
>>
>> >The other issue t
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Just a reminder]
>
> While we are here talking about the Mozilla Firefox case, don't forget
> Debian distributes Mozilla and Mozilla Thunderbird as well, in the
> same conditions.
>
> Mike
I would be interested to see a comparison of the Mozilla trademar
[Just a reminder]
While we are here talking about the Mozilla Firefox case, don't forget
Debian distributes Mozilla and Mozilla Thunderbird as well, in the same
conditions.
Mike
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:02:58PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> On that theme, I think it's worth distinguishing between trademark and
> copyright licenses -- the icon is distributable if its copyright
> license is OK, but the trademark license is needed to make the graphic
> the default ic
Doug basically pointed out where you can find the information you
wanted. Let me just respond to a few things you said:
* Asa Dotzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Before we're willing to sanction the distribution of a modified version
> of Firefox under our trademark name and logo, we need to kno
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004, Ben Goodger wrote:
>> Does DFSG imply that anyone can modify and use the Firefox artwork
>> for any purpose? If so, then we have additional issues.
>
> Yes, in general.
>
> You can require that they indicate that they have modified t
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004, Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Before we're willing to sanction the distribution of a modified
> version of Firefox under our trademark name and logo, we need to
> know what those changes are, specifically.
While I can't speak for Eric specifically, in general, the changeset
for a packa
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004, Ben Goodger wrote:
> Does DFSG imply that anyone can modify and use the Firefox artwork
> for any purpose? If so, then we have additional issues.
Yes, in general.
You can require that they indicate that they have modified the
artwork, and you may be able to restrict confusin
* Ben Goodger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> >Hi Ben,
> >
> >
> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm replying to this including our QA person, Asa Dotzler who is
> interested in these matters.
[snip]
>
> Asa will comment more here.
>
> >The other issue that came up was that of the Firefox a
Ben Goodger wrote:
Eric Dorland wrote:
Hi Ben,
Hi Eric,
I'm replying to this including our QA person, Asa Dotzler who is
interested in these matters.
You probably don't know me, so let me introduce myself: I'm the
Firefox maintainer in Debian. I'm contacting you because of the issue
o
Eric Dorland wrote:
Hi Ben,
Hi Eric,
I'm replying to this including our QA person, Asa Dotzler who is
interested in these matters.
You probably don't know me, so let me introduce myself: I'm the
Firefox maintainer in Debian. I'm contacting you because of the issue
of the Firefox tradema
Hi Ben,
You probably don't know me, so let me introduce myself: I'm the
Firefox maintainer in Debian. I'm contacting you because of the issue
of the Firefox trademarks, both on the name and the artwork. Looking
at your licensing and trademark page
(http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/licensing.html)
12 matches
Mail list logo
