On Saturday 9 December 2000, at 1 h 8,
the keyboard of Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Same with "dselect Documentation for Beginners".
>
> I guess there would be no problem making this the same as the Installation
> manual, Stéphane?
Certainly, specially since I'm not the author. I
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:56:48PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> The release-notes for example have no explicit license, but also no (C);
> I don't know what that would mean for DSFG-freeness.
Well, all the information in the Release Notes originates from different
sources, it wouldn't seem fair to
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:56:48PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> Anything with a (C) notice and NO explicit license is NOT DSFG-free.
> The release-notes for example have no explicit license, but also no (C);
> I don't know what that would mean for DSFG-freeness.
(C) is irrelevant in any Berne Tr
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, David Starner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> >
> > I think that we should work in having an uniform license for all the
> > documents distributed from the DDP. Currently all documents have a
> > copyright/license that
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
>
> I think that we should work in having an uniform license for all the
> documents distributed from the DDP. Currently all documents have a
> copyright/license that suited the author but I fear that no serious work
I think that we should work in having an uniform license for all the
documents distributed from the DDP. Currently all documents have a
copyright/license that suited the author but I fear that no serious work has
been done in order to make sure that it is a license that will suit Debian's
6 matches
Mail list logo
