On Feb 9, 2017 9:45 AM, "Jens Reyer" wrote:
On 02/07/2017 09:52 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jens Reyer writes ("New upstream changing license, typo and
SPDX-License-Identifier"):
>> 1. LGPL-2+ --> LGPL-2.1+
>>
[...]
> There is no pr
On 02/07/2017 09:52 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jens Reyer writes ("New upstream changing license, typo and
> SPDX-License-Identifier"):
>> 1. LGPL-2+ --> LGPL-2.1+
>>
[...]
> There is no problem with this. Licence version upgrade is rout
Jens Reyer writes ("New upstream changing license, typo and
SPDX-License-Identifier"):
> 1. LGPL-2+ --> LGPL-2.1+
>
>
> One has a notice for the "GNU Lesser General Public License" v2 (or
> later).[2] However in v2 the LGPL
Hi all,
I'm working with upstream of winetricks (in CC) on clarifiying/changing
the license of some files.[1]
1. LGPL-2+ --> LGPL-2.1+
One has a notice for the "GNU Lesser General Public License" v2 (or
later).[2] However in v2 the LGPL was the "GNU *Library* General P
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Patryk Cisek wrote:
>> license? Well, they have rights to their patches, but copyright holder
>> for
>> Kadu is Kadu Team (http://www.kadu.net/wiki/index.php/English:Authors).
>> Could someone, please, clarify this?
>
> For license changes, the copyright holder(s) are the
Patryk Cisek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
> There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
> OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not aware
> of the conflict, so they didn't add
Dnia poniedziałek, 4 września 2006 21:02, Tommi Mäkitalo napisał:
> I looked at the sources just to check if I can help. I ported my
> C++-application (tntnet) from openssl to gnutls to fix the license-problem
> as Kari Pahula suggested here (and me). But I found out, that all
> openssl-checks are
Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 17:58 schrieb Patryk Cisek:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
> There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
> OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not aware
>
Patryk Cisek wrote:
> license? Well, they have rights to their patches, but copyright holder for
> Kadu is Kadu Team (http://www.kadu.net/wiki/index.php/English:Authors).
> Could someone, please, clarify this?
For license changes, the copyright holder(s) are the important ones.
If the Kadu tea
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 05:58:12PM +0200, Patryk Cisek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
> There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
> OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not a
Hello,
I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not aware of
the conflict, so they didn't add a proper exception. However, n
11 matches
Mail list logo