On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:43:39 + (UTC) Sam Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:45:36 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, there are also CC-v2.x and even CC-v1.0 licensed
> > works in main (possibly allowed in by mistake or overlook).
>
> Would you mind elaborating?
Sure:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:45:36 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On the other hand, there are also CC-v2.x and even CC-v1.0 licensed
> works in main (possibly allowed in by mistake or overlook).
Would you mind elaborating? If they are not DFSG-free then they should be
removed from main.
--
Sam Morr
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:23:16 -0300 Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
>
> The wikipedia page "Creative_Commons_licenses"[1] states :
[...]
> However, BrunoKleinert has added CC-SA 3.0 to the DFSG wiki page.
>
> I assume that one one the page is outdated or wrong (probably the
> wikipedia page)
Hello,
The wikipedia page "Creative_Commons_licenses"[1] states :
> The maintainers of Debian GNU/Linux, a Linux distribution known for
> its adherence to software freedom, do not believe that even the
> Creative Commons Attribution License, the least restrictive of the
> licenses, adheres to th
4 matches
Mail list logo