Em Ter, 2006-10-31 às 11:27 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:19:02PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Version 1.2 of gnomemm (which is the one involved in this bug) is
> > > licensed under the GPL.
> >
> Wouldn't it be
Em Ter, 2006-10-31 às 15:28 +, MJ Ray escreveu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be possible to link to libgnutls instead of libssl? It seems
> > that GNU TLS provides an API compatible with OpenSSL.
>
> The compatible API is part of GNUTLS-EXTRA, which is also GPL. See
> http://jos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to link to libgnutls instead of libssl? It seems
> that GNU TLS provides an API compatible with OpenSSL.
The compatible API is part of GNUTLS-EXTRA, which is also GPL. See
http://josefsson.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gnutls/includes/gnutls/openssl.h?
Sorry, the following message should have been sent to all of you.
Please, include MJ Ray in the reply.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#395961: gabber: Links with GPL-incompatible licensed OpenSSL
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:19:02PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Version 1.2 of gnomemm (which is the one involved in this bug) is
> > licensed under the GPL.
>
> ACK. I jumped version somewhere. Probably its upstream is not averse
> to relicensin
Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version 1.2 of gnomemm (which is the one involved in this bug) is
> licensed under the GPL.
ACK. I jumped version somewhere. Probably its upstream is not averse
to relicensing or giving extra permissions, as 1.3 onwards is LGPL, but
this is
Em Ter, 2006-10-31 às 11:08 +, MJ Ray escreveu:
> http://gtkmm.sourceforge.net/ says: 'gtkmm is free software distributed
> under the GNU Library General Public License (LGPL).' The COPYING in
> the stable libgnomemm*tar.bz2 seems to confirm that.
>
> Why is debian distributing libgnomemm und
[gnomemm maintainer added to cc]
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this exception should be copied into the debian/copyright,
[...]
I agree. As well as breaking policy, it means the same report may
appear again.
> Moreover: it seems that one of the libraries the package depend
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:19:00 -0300 Goedson Teixeira Paixao wrote:
[...]
> Gabber's license has an exception allowing linking to OpenSSL. See the
> COPYING.exception file in its sources.
I think this exception should be copied into the debian/copyright,
because otherwise the latter file does not c
9 matches
Mail list logo
