Loïc Minier wrote (in bug 330355):
I'm happy you took the time to verify this for Ubuntu. I did a quick
search in the xine-devel archive between 2004-01 and 2005-09
confirming:
- the announcement of the relicensing process
- confirmation that most persons, including Major MMS, and most CVS
Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
> Package: libmms
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> According to,
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xine-devel&m=107261185004445&w=2 , since
> they can't find where to contact the author of majormms, either in
> majormms website, http://www.ge
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
> So I could give another example.
> If the new project copy code from Qt and the project itself is licensed under
> LGPL. While it is obviously that some parts of code is from Qt, and no any
> approval from trolltech to be relicensed,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Ah; my understanding was that there were some parts (the xmms header
> files?) which were GPL only, and that the rest of libmms was licenced
> under the LGPL, which is what I retitled the bug to clarify. [If
> that's actually the case, as debian/copyrigh
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Loic: The only actual (minor) issue here is that the package doesn't
> > reference the GPL and include the copyright+licensing statement of the
> > parts that are GPL licensed. It would also be useful to includ
severity 386406 important
tags 386406 + moreinfo
retitle 386406 Some bits might not have been properly relicensed, but please
provide/gather more information
stop
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Loic: The only actual (minor) issue here is that the package doesn't
> refer
retitle 386406 debian/copyright should include actual text of the copyright
statement and reference LGPL and GPL
severity 386406 minor
thanks
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
> According to Section 3 of LGPL, Debian or anyone can relicense LGPL
> software into the ordinary GPL. Deb
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
> If there's one upstream that extract and modify dll files from Windows Media
> Player and relicense those dll to some freeware license, then this upstream
> software
> can be packaged into Debian/non-free? Although it is apparently t
Hi,
> - Original Message
> From: Lo?c Minier
>
> Now, what is the basis of your claims that this might not be LGPL?
> What new information did you find?
>
> And why are you discussing this with Debian? This seems like an
> upstream problem to me and something to discuss with upstream.
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006, Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
> According to,
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xine-devel&m=107261185004445&w=2 , since
> they can't find where to contact the author of majormms, either in
> majormms website, http://www.geocities.com/majormms/ , and its source,
> ht
10 matches
Mail list logo
