Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-26 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:40:02AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: > > >I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of > >the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters. > > Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-26 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Don Armstrong wrote: I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters. Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters are actually midnight blue ;-)

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Marco d'Itri wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >From what I can tell, the overall consensus was that sarge should > >release with GFDLed and similar works in place, and that we should > >remove these works post-sarge. > > You are confusing the result of a votation with a c

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From what I can tell, the overall consensus was that sarge should >release with GFDLed and similar works in place, and that we should >remove these works post-sarge. You are confusing the result of a votation with a consensus. These are pretty different things. -- ciao,

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> They've concluded that the GNU FDL does not satisfy the DFSG, > > Yes. > >> and that everything in Debian (apparently modulo licenses >> themselves) must satisfy the DFSG. > > No. The latest amendment to the soci

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote: > They've concluded that the GNU FDL does not satisfy the DFSG, Yes. > and that everything in Debian (apparently modulo licenses > themselves) must satisfy the DFSG. No. The latest amendment to the social contract (GR 2004-004) indicates that we should at l

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-23 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:13:38PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Brain Carlson, thanks for doing Debian and the release process this > > dis-service. > > There are *lots* more people to thank for this. Brian Carlson is > just the latest. Brian Carlson and others, thanks for your efforts in ensurin

Re: Bug#281672: marked as done (autoconf: non-free documentation)

2004-11-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041123 20:55]: >>* Removed documentation. Hope this makes everyone happy. Closes: >> #281671, #281672, #143536. > > No, it doesn't. I hope that you don't mind to much for speaking > that. Take