On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:38:26AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
> > If this is agreed upon by everyone - then it makes sense to talk
> > about the choice of venue versus choise of law thing.
> > Provided that libcwd WILL be included in Debian, I am willing to
> > change the wording of the last
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:38:26AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > If this is agreed upon by everyone - then it makes sense to talk
> > about the choice of venue versus choise of law thing.
> > Provided that libcwd WILL be included in Debian, I am willing to
> > change the wording of the last se
Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:15:26PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
>> As for 6c, I am convinced by the arguments in
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00626.html
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00626.html
>>
>> which render its problems
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:15:50AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> If this is agreed upon by everyone - then it makes sense to talk
> about the choice of venue versus choise of law thing.
> Provided that libcwd WILL be included in Debian, I am willing to
> change the wording of the last sentence into on
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:15:26PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> As for 6c, I am convinced by the arguments in
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00626.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00626.html
>
> which render its problems moot. As long as the origin
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debian-legal, I am CC'ing y'all for hope of valuable input. Please
> refer to http://bugs.debian.org/251983 for a history of this
> discussion.
>
> It's about the QPL, specifically term 6c. and the choice of legal
> venue, which Nathanael claims to be i
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 23:33:14 +0200 martin f krafft wrote:
> i release all my work under the artistic licence, or the
> do-as-you-damned-well-please licence, or an attribution licence.
> afaict, all these allow closed derivation. yet, they are all
> dfsg-free.
If you are referring to the Creative C
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:33:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.01.1951 +0200]:
> > The choice of law is my choice and not of the person who doesn't
> > follow the rules of the license. I am convinced that the choice
> > of law has no influenc
(Nathanael dropped from CC; I'm fairly certain he's subscribed.)
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 11:33:14PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.01.1951 +0200]:
> > The choice of law is my choice and not of the person who doesn't
> > follow the rules of the l
debian-legal, I am CC'ing y'all for hope of valuable input. Please
refer to http://bugs.debian.org/251983 for a history of this
discussion.
It's about the QPL, specifically term 6c. and the choice of legal
venue, which Nathanael claims to be in contradiction with the DFSG,
but which has never real
10 matches
Mail list logo
