On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:54, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
[...]
> * The lack of source.
>
> > Assuming my understanding is correct, what would be the best strategy
> > for approaching Amstrad to make the minimal change in order to have
> > Spectrum ROMs in main?
>
> I don't see any evidence th
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You forgot to mention:
> >
> > * The lack of source.
>
> That can probably be worked around:
> As I said elsewhere, they can't make it available, because they no
> longer have it (um, I can't seem to find where I read that, so I might
Sorry, I didn't r
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:54:43PM +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hm, it seems that we're actually a surprisingly large part of the way to
> > being DFSG-free here. There are two stumbling blocks:
> >
> > * There's no explicit permission to distribute
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hm, it seems that we're actually a surprisingly large part of the way to
> being DFSG-free here. There are two stumbling blocks:
>
> * There's no explicit permission to distribute as part of things that
> aren't emulators. This is more serious than it loo
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:37:59AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Hm, it seems that we're actually a surprisingly large part of the way to
> being DFSG-free here. There are two stumbling blocks:
>
> * There's no explicit permission to distribute as part of things that
> aren't emulators. This
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:42:12AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:27:15AM +0100, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 08:49:21PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> > > It depends on spectrum-roms and must therefore go in contrib.
> >
> > We had a discussion abour ZX R
6 matches
Mail list logo