Re: Apache LGPL compatibility

2010-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:30:03 +0200 Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Hi. Hi! > > I searched with Google about this topic, but couldn't find anything that > made me sure enough. So I'm asking here now. I think the reason why you have received very few answers so far is probably that what you are see

Re: Apache LGPL compatibility

2010-05-26 Thread Henri Yandell
The Apache comment got me reading (Hello from legal-disc...@apache :) ). I thought I'd mention that clause 3 doesn't seem like an advertising clause to me; just attribution. Including the text below in a LICENSE, NOTICE or a COPYING would seem to cover clause 3. Hen On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:30

Apache LGPL compatibility

2010-05-14 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi. I searched with Google about this topic, but couldn't find anything that made me sure enough. So I'm asking here now. I have an LGPL Java library (jgrapht) that uses some classes from another library (touchgraph). jgrapht is LGPL-2.1+. touchgraph uses a modified form of the Apache 1.1 licens