On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 06:19:36PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > There's no such thing as a copyleft MIT license. Fundamental to the
> > concept of the MIT/BSD license is that they're permissive--they let
> > you do whatever you want, placing very few restrictions on the work.
> > "Permissive"
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 04:29:29PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> The non-GPL copyleft license I've most frequently encountered is the LGPL.
> If A is GPLed and B is LGPLed, it's legal to produce C which is derived
> from A and B without getting any further permissions. [B isn't the GPL,
> but its te
Raul Miller wrote:
The non-GPL copyleft license I've most frequently encountered is the LGPL.
If A is GPLed and B is LGPLed, it's legal to produce C which is derived
from A and B without getting any further permissions. [B isn't the GPL,
but its terms do not impose anything which is more restri
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can release software under multiple licenses if you're the copyright
> > holder. If you're not a copyright holder you can still release something
> > derived from it under the terms of the gpl if the other copyright doesn't
> > have restrictions bey
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:48:58PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
> > > could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
> > > but I'm not quite sure
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
> > could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
> > but I'm not quite sure. It's the licence of python-gtk2-tutorial. Since
> > there's no descri
On 2004-08-22 15:36:20 +0100 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: [...]
GPL requires that derived works be released under the GPL. You can't
do
both of these at the same time.
I think I disagree.
You can release software under
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can release software under multiple licenses if you're the copyright
> holder. If you're not a copyright holder you can still release something
> derived from it under the terms of the gpl if the other copyright doesn't
> have restrictions beyond what
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> It requires that derived works be released under the same license. The
> GPL requires that derived works be released under the GPL. You can't do
> both of these at the same time.
I think I disagree.
You can release software under
Freek Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22-8-2004 14:58, "Andrew Suffield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is a GPL-incompatible, copyleft, DFSG-free license. In other
>> respects it is a MIT clone, not a BSD one; this is essentially a
>> copyleft MIT license.
>
> Out of curiousity:
> W
On 22-8-2004 14:58, "Andrew Suffield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
>> could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
>> but I'm not quite sure. It's the licence of python-gtk2-tutorial. Since
>> there's no descript
Andrew Suffield wrote:
[...]
This is a GPL-incompatible, copyleft, DFSG-free license. In other
respects it is a MIT clone, not a BSD one; this is essentially a
copyleft MIT license.
So basically, it's DFSG-compliant and can be safely included in
'main', right?
Oh, and as a general note: DON
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 01:58:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
> > could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
> > but I'm not quite sure. It's the licence of python-gtk2-tutorial. Since
> > there's no descri
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:51:39PM +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
> could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
> but I'm not quite sure. It's the licence of python-gtk2-tutorial. Since
> there's no description of what kind of licence this actually is, I'm afraid
> the ftp-mast
Hi everyone,
could someone check this licence[1]? I believe it's somewhat BSD-like,
but I'm not quite sure. It's the licence of python-gtk2-tutorial. Since
there's no description of what kind of licence this actually is, I'm afraid
the ftp-masters won't like it...
TIA,
Igor
[1]:
http://www.pygt
15 matches
Mail list logo
