Re: A need for a document license

2001-11-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 11:01:13PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote: > Fine. So ye people of FSF, how about an update to GNU FDL 1.2 that > restricts the invariant sections on meta-sections? I suggest that if you want to address the FSF, you mail them. -- G. Branden Robinson|Any m

Re: A need for a document license

2001-11-27 Thread Bernd Warken
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:38:37PM +, M. Drew Streib wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote: > > A new kind of document license based on the GNU Free Documentation > > License is needed. Who is interested? > > I think that a better idea might be to better defin

Re: A need for a document license

2001-11-27 Thread M. Drew Streib
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote: > A new kind of document license based on the GNU Free Documentation > License is needed. Who is interested? I think that a better idea might be to better define what is and isn't allowed in the "invariant sections" defined by the FDL

A need for a document license

2001-11-27 Thread Bernd Warken
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:52:43PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Moreover, the DFSG applies to *software* by its own explicit terms, > and we simply have never had (nor needed) to worry over much about > other kinds of material. Things which do not directly impact the > freedom of *softw