Re: [opal@debian.org: Re: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)]

2004-08-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Thomas Bushnell wrote: > In the old version, he did so in the file LICENSE, but that is > technically not enough--you must do so in such a way that identifies > *which files* are being licensed. The normal way is to put the > license statement in every file; but he could also list the files in > L

Re: [opal@debian.org: Re: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)]

2004-08-18 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:53:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well well. I assume of non-serious priority right? > > I did a random check of tree packages. 2 of them was correct and 1 did > > not include such source comments (hsftp).