Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-28 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:56:04 +0200 Ferenc Kovacs wrote: [...] > I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it seems too > specific for php-src, and they only want to avoid possible license > infringement. As far as I can say, the issue pointed out by the Debian Project is exac

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 09:56 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > I think the difference is that we have a couple of clauses which sounds > > weird/makes no sense when the license is used for extensions or anything > > else than php-src, like

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Johannes Schlüter
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 09:56 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > I think the difference is that we have a couple of clauses which sounds > weird/makes no sense when the license is used for extensions or anything > else than php-src, like clause 3, 4 and 6. > And this is what they were complaining about in

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ulf Wendel
Am 27.06.2014 13:18, schrieb Pierre Joye: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ulf Wendel wrote: > >> I perceive this reply as both sarcastic and agressive. Any particular >> reason bashing someone doing nothing but asking not to rush? > > It is certainly due to the language differences but there

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Pierre Joye
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ulf Wendel wrote: > I perceive this reply as both sarcastic and agressive. Any particular > reason bashing someone doing nothing but asking not to rush? It is certainly due to the language differences but there was nothing sarcastic nor aggressive in my reply. So

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ulf Wendel
Am 27.06.2014 11:28, schrieb Pierre Joye: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel wrote: >> Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >>> I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it seems too >>> specific for php-src, and they only want to avoid possible license >>>

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Pierre Joye
On Jun 27, 2014 12:00 PM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel wrote: >> >> Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >> >>> I think th

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel > wrote: > >> Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: > >>> I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it > seem

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Pierre Joye
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel wrote: >> Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >>> I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it seems too >>> specific for php-src, and they only want to avoid possible

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Pierre Joye
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Ulf Wendel wrote: > Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: >> I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it seems too >> specific for php-src, and they only want to avoid possible license >> infringement. > > Just keep the scope of any pos

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I think the difference is that we have a couple of clauses which sounds > weird/makes no sense when the license is used for extensions or anything > else than php-src, like clause 3, 4 and 6. > And this is what they were complaining about in the thread referenced > from their reject faq: > h

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ulf Wendel
Am 27.06.2014 09:56, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: > I think they just consider our license troublesome for exts as it seems too > specific for php-src, and they only want to avoid possible license > infringement. Just keep the scope of any possible PHP license change in mind. You got one player, a cons

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > > Debian began to send requests to change PHP license for the PHP > > Extension arguing that the PHP License is only valid for PHP itself. > > That's like saying Apache license is only valid for Apache httpd, and > Mozilla license is