On Wed, 14 May 2003, Mark Rafn wrote:
[snip areas of broad agreement]
> I can't think of a freedom that is useful for program documentation that
> it not equally important for a novel. Likewise software itself ->
> documentation.
Modifiability. The subject of a novel is far more static than
[I think we basically agree, so I've marked this OT]
> > > Documentation relating to software needs to be really free, in order
> > > that we can manipulate it in far more interesting ways (such as
> > > refcarding it, embedding it as online help, or updating it because of
> > > advances in the pr
2 matches
Mail list logo
