On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:11 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
> , and it's possible to read it as prohibting, for example, running Open
>> Motif on a privately-modified version of Debian or Fedora.
>>
>
> Richard
>
>
Or more applicably to the modern world, perhaps running it in a Docker
container that h
Tom Callaway dixit:
>On 10/26/2018 11:32 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> So if it's not as free everywhere as it would be in Debian,
>> it's not free enough for Debian.
>
>It has never happened that I know of, but if there were a copyright
>license which was somehow okay only in Fedora (but not for an
On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 21:29 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is it necessary that an open source license must allow porting to
> proprietary systems? I don't think so today. But based on what I
> found out about the OpenMotif license, people actually thought that
> back then. This surprises me. H
On 10/26/2018 11:32 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> So if it's not as free everywhere as it would be in Debian,
> it's not free enough for Debian.
It has never happened that I know of, but if there were a copyright
license which was somehow okay only in Fedora (but not for anyone
downstream of us), we
4 matches
Mail list logo
