http://www.FastCashEmail.com/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
×¢²á·½·¨£º µã»÷ÉÏÃæµÄÁ´½Ó£¬ÔÚYour e_mail
address:ÏÂÊäÈëÄãµÄµç×ÓÓÊÏ䣬°´Continue¼ÌÐø
´ËºóÒ»·ÖÖÓÄãµÄÖ¸¶¨ÐÅÏ佫ÊÕµ½FastCashEmail.comµÄÈ·ÈÏÐÅ£¬ÔÚÐÅÖа´È·¶¨Á¬½Ó£¬´ËʱҪÊäÈëÄãµÄ
ÈçÏ嵀 ¸öÈËÐÅÏ¢£º£¨ÆäÖдø¡°*¡±µÄΪ±ØÌîÏîÄ¿£©£º
First ÄúµÄÃû×Ö LastÄúµÄ
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Raul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "none" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: Combining proprieta
This not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "none" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: Combining proprieta
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc.
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: Combining proprietary code and GPL
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "John Galt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: Co
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTE
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is hereby
established. etc etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: Q: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use
> My program works well
- Original Message -
From: "Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: Q: Combining proprietary code and GPL for in-house use
[snip]
> > Of course, we're talking only about U.S. law here. The relevant laws in
> > other jurisdictions
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chloe Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSSL and GPLed programs
> "Chloe Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't see how "contract issues are entirel
This is not legal advice. No lawyer-client relationship is established. etc.
etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Raul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: Question about the old BSD license and GPL (gtkipms
ch is perfectly fine, because all of those people explicitly have
> > the right to download L. There isn't even minor breach of copyright
> > going on in the B does.
>
> Not for the purpose of linking with P, they don't.
>
> > > This is a clear attempt to e
This is not legal advice, no attorney-client relationship is hereby
established, etc. etc.
Not to beat this one to death - just to clarify some inaccuracies and
hopefully a summary
- Original Message -
From: "John Galt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeffry Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "S
This is not legal advice, no solicitor-client relationship is established,
etc.
I think this is one of those circumstances where a lawyer that has
experience with software copyright and licensing matters should be consulted
(perhaps/probably the company's lawyer).
There are many issues here off t
This is not legal advice, no solicitor-client relationship is established,
etc.
Actually, "clean room" implementations are typically used to avoid potential
charges of copyright infringement. The basic concept is to take the ideas of
the software, convey those ideas to untainted developers, and th
14 matches
Mail list logo
