❦ 4 juin 2019 15:23 -04, Nat Tuck :
> The firefox-esr package in Buster includes the encrypted media
> extension functionality, which relies on library called "wildvine".
> Source for this library is not included in the firefox-esr source
> package.
Encrypted Media Extensions are also needed to
❦ 18 mars 2019 15:45 +00, Paul Jakma :
>> Being merely dependent on third-party code is not, to my
>> understanding, sufficient to be considered derived code.
>
> If code which is written to depend explicitly and heavily on the APIs
> and frameworks provided by GPL is /not/ considered subject to
❦ 15 octobre 2015 10:26 +1100, Ben Finney :
>> > I am personally convinced that nowadays the definition of source
>> > should *no longer* be regarded as an open question: I think that the
>> > most commonly used and accepted definition of source code is the one
>> > found in the GNU GPL license.
❦ 18 janvier 2015 12:16 +0100, "W. Martin Borgert" :
>> Then as is, the software can't go into Debian. Maybe you could try
>> contacting upstream to ask them for an OpenSSL exception?
>
> Upstream has been contacted. So far they seem to think, that
> this is a Debian internal issue and don't wan
❦ 17 janvier 2015 19:14 +0100, "W. Martin Borgert" :
> sorry, if this question has been discussed before.
> Python program or library "X" is licensed under GPL3+ without
> OpenSSL exception. "X" does use the python-requests library,
> which on load dynamically links the Python interpreter with
❦ 9 mai 2014 11:26 -0700, Walter Landry :
> I do not see any permission to redistribute. Many organizations want
> to be the sole source of their software, so redistribution is not
> something you should assume. So this license will not work. You
> could ask Perforce to give Debian permissio
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du dimanche 24 avril 2011, vers 00:07, Ken
Arromdee disait :
>> The lawyer wants the poster to pay 700 Euro and stop uploading of Debian.
>> -
>> My opion is that this behavior is not good for Debian's reputation
>> and the project should take
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du dimanche 28 septembre 2008, vers 12:45,
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> severity 498857 important
> severity 498477 important
> thanks
>> I don't know the real implication on the license
> if you're unsure then don't make it RC in the first place
T
reopen 498857
reopen 498477
thanks
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 19 septembre 2008, vers 00:53,
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> Hi Vincent,
> thanks for looking into licensing issues in Debian.
> How exactly is the python license GPL-incompatible?
> If you scroll down
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du samedi 16 août 2008, vers 06:47,
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> Do you think AGPLv3 is DFSG-free?
Hi Miriam!
Some discussions have already taken place here. The outcome was AGPLv3
was not DFSG free, but it wasn't really a sharp stateme
OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 12 mai 2008, vers 19:03, Evgeni Golov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I have adopted some packages (unshield, dynamite, orange) and while I
> looked for a sponsor on debian-mentors, Vincent Bernat said, I should
> include the copyright of "ltm
Hi!
AGPLv3 license has been discussed in this list some time ago:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/11/msg00232.html
However, no final conclusion was drawn. Would a web application licensed
with AGPLv3 meet DFSG conditions?
Thanks.
--
Don't comment bad code - rewrite it.
-
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 05 avril 2008, vers
13:00, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> First try to get the data licence fixed upstream.
Unfortunately, upstream does not want to relicense those files
yet. Therefore, I have prepared an upload for non-fr
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 05 avril 2008, vers
13:00, "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> First try to get the data licence fixed upstream.
I have sent him a mail about this matter.
> If that doesn't work, either put it in non-free or strip the non-free
> data and
Hi!
Nikto is a security web scanner licensed under GPLv2 only. It was
orphaned some time ago and I am packaging the new upstream version.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nikto.html
While nikto.pl (the executable) is licensed under GPLv2, the data files
that are used have a pretty restric
15 matches
Mail list logo
