Hi,
the XZ upstream project thinks about changing the license from Public
Domain to BSD Zero clause license:
https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/issues/79
I *think* the PD "license" has no copyright and this isn't an issue for
Debian.
Could someone please comment on behalf of the Debia
On December 7, 2018 6:34:39 PM UTC, Francesco Poli
wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Dec 2018 17:04:22 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
>This has already been mentioned in the past:
>https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/09/msg1.html
>
>It was a long ongoing process.
>The news is that it seems to have finally c
On December 7, 2018 6:04:22 AM UTC, Ben Finney wrote:
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes:
>> The wording (of the addon) was drafted on debian-legal a few years
>> back.
>
>Can you give citations to what you're referring to? there have been
>many
>such discussion
Ben Finney writes:
>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[hidden email]> writes:
>
>> Clamav for instance has this piece:
>
>Right. That piece is not part of any version of the GPL; it is an
>additional clause in the grant for recipients of that specific work
>(ClamAV).
Hi,
GPL software has an exception clause in order to link against OpenSSL
which has the advertising clause. Clamav for instance has this piece:
| In addition, as a special exception, the copyright holders give
| permission to link the code of portions of this program with the
| OpenSSL library un
5 matches
Mail list logo
