On Fri, Jan 26, 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> "4. Products derived from this software may not be called "VOCAL", nor
> may "VOCAL" appear in their name, without prior written
> permission."
>
> Is this compatible with the third clause of the DFSG ? It looks like a
> restriction on the di
liant but is still
annoying. I have a doubt about how enforcable the file extension stuff
is. They want credit for their code, but they don't want us to use their
name.
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://sam.zoy.org/>
for DVDs in Linux screw the MPAA and ; do dig $DVDs.z.zoy.org ; done | \
perl -ne 's/\.//g; print pack("H224",$1) if(/^x([^z]*)/)' | gunzip
cense for
their webserver:
* 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache"
*nor may "Apache" appear in their names without prior written
*permission of the Apache Group.
You might find this solution acceptable, since it is DFSG compatible.
Regards
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000, Paul Serice wrote:
> Samuel Hocevar wrote:
Next time I'd be glad if you didn't send my *private* E-mails to a
mailing list without asking me. I don't suppose debian-legal was set up
for your personal rants/trolls, and I have no intention to take part to
id, just have a look at the very last sentence of
section 2 of the GPL.
Regards,
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
1024D/29499F61 1999-04-221155 4B19 A50F 1136 6E60 A499 7CF3 F5AF 2949 9F61
dig goret.org @zoy.org axfr \
| perl -e 'for(sort(<>)){print pack("H32",$1) if(/^c..\.(\w+)/)}' | gzip -d
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:
> I want to package something with this license. Is it acceptable to
> go into main? I'm most concerned with the 2nd paragraph -- does it
> pass DFSG 1?
I don't think so. Also, this license does not explicitly allow
modification and redistributi
- the VideoLAN project
[2] http://www.opendvd.org/ - about legal issues of DVD playback
[3] http://www.linuxvideo.org/ - the Linux DVD effort
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
Do not try and fight the Cabal. That's impossible.
Instead only try t
olan.org/ - the VideoLAN project
[2] http://www.opendvd.org/ - about legal issues of DVD playback
[3] http://www.linuxvideo.org/ - the Linux DVD effort
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
Do not try and fight the Cabal. That's impossible.
Instead only try t
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> The paragraph says "License Must NOT Contaminate Other Software".
> As Debian and the FSF agree that the GPL and QPL are incompatible
> and this is mainly the cause of the GPL which requires "the whole work"
> distributed under "THIS license" this means
but it might be worth a look :
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/#nntp
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
echo "what is the universe"|tr "a-z " 0-7-0-729|sed 's/9.//g;s/-/+/'|bc
the Program, according
to the GPL's section 0 (if I didn't miss anything there - IANAL).
Thus I think it can only be licensed under the GPL, unless of course the
author decides to release it under another license as well.
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via
ch programs to change the free
libraries that are incorporated in them.
See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lgpl.html
Regards,
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
echo "what is the universe"|tr "a-z " 0-7-0-729|sed 's/9.//g;s/-/+/'|bc
On Thu, Jul 29, 1999, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 28-Jul-99, 07:57 (CDT), Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Meanwhile, he implemented Igor's patch for VMS to one of those
> > two 0.6.1 versions.
>
> This is the most alarming section. Did the pat
Jean-Marc allowed to use those patches in the non-free version
of IglooFTP ?
Thanks a lot for your information,
Sam.
--
Samuel Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.via.ecp.fr/~sam/
echo "what is the universe"|tr "a-z " 0-7-0-729|sed 's/9.//g;s/-/+/'|bc
14 matches
Mail list logo
