Re: CC-SA 3.0 on wiki page.

2008-08-15 Thread Sam Morris
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:45:36 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On the other hand, there are also CC-v2.x and even CC-v1.0 licensed > works in main (possibly allowed in by mistake or overlook). Would you mind elaborating? If they are not DFSG-free then they should be removed from main. -

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-18 Thread Sam Morris
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:58:09 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Could someone explain to me why firebird is in main? > > It is my opinion that the MPL license fails to meet the DFSG. ... Presumably this also applies to Bugzilla, which is licensed under the MPL. -- Sam Morris http://robo

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system

2006-03-18 Thread Sam Morris
Måns Rullgård wrote: Flaming aside, this is a non-issue. The source for cdrecord contains invariant sections (those obnoxious "warnings" about using device names), so it's certainly not DFSG-free. Just use dvdrtools instead. Oh? How is it in main then? -- Sam Morris http:

Re: EUPL draft

2005-07-22 Thread Sam Morris
This file requires a password for access. Error: /invalidfileaccess in pdf_process_Encrypt An encouraging start. ;) -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a