prang, but I'll tidy this up the for the next upload.
Cheers,
Ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave a quite
different serious bug on our hands we should know more about.
I don't think that is the case though, I do agree this file needs
the same sort of treatment the Smith inquisition recently gave the
rest of the package text, and that will be done, but its probably
not a job for -legal,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
> Anthony Towns [...]
[snip]
> 4. there's already working java in main; and
Partly/somewhat/mostly working.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "co
Thank you Steve. That helps greatly. I don't believe he is the sole
copyright holder, but I can not state that with 100% certainty. I will look
into using a different system.
Best regards,
Ron
Hello,
I found the thread at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200302/msg00164.html
regarding the licensing information on PHP-Nuke. Unfortunately, I was
unable to find a conclusion/consensus on the issue. As an end user of this
program, can anyone tell me if this program qua
ebs may fall under the terms of the
exception, some may be pure LGPL, in which case anyone wanting to produce
non-free apps with the wxwin .debs would have to check the licencing of
what they were using closely. People distributing GPL/LGPL apps have
nothing to worry about.
Ron
(currently it do
oving any trace of doubt about the licence itself.
Ron
Hi,
could someone please confirm that this licence is in fact DFSG free.
(Or explain why it's not so I can lean on the upstream authors :-)
wxwin is already in main under these terms, but it's been suggested
that -legal look it over before I upload 2.2.
thanks,
Ron
(please CC me,
8 matches
Mail list logo
