Re: GFDL

2003-09-30 Thread Remi Vanicat
Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) a tapoté : > >> Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > If you want to criticize the FSF based on things you can imagine we >> > might do, I am sure you can imagine no end of nasty possibilities. >> >

Re: Starting to talk

2003-09-26 Thread Remi Vanicat
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2003-09-23 02:38:44 +0100 Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Whoa. "You don't agree with me/the majority, so go away..." I don't >> like the way you say this. > > That's probably bec

Re: Starting to talk

2003-09-24 Thread Remi Vanicat
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2003-09-22 15:14:45 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Does the DFSG definition of freedom that applies to program >> (nobody question that) help us to draw the line at the correct place >> also for documentation? > > Trivially, all Debian devel

Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"

2003-09-21 Thread Remi Vanicat
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you are aware of the existence of unmodifyable essays and logos in > debian main, please file an RC bug against the package in question. > > You seem to be saying that if our political statements, which are > included as invariant sections,