On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:17:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:48:00PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> > > Debian needs to make a decision on how it will deal with this legal
> > > minefield. Tha
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > interested in java in non-free, it's not your job to try to forbid them to
> > work on that.
>
> Not if it hurts the project. And it does.
You think it does. Others do. Others don't. I don't. Start a GR if you
think the ftpmasters are wrong. There'
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 22:38 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> > Given this legal background of yours, could you please help by using that
> > to improve the licence, instead of just complaining about how others
> > handled it? Please give the righ
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I know I shouldn't, but I was really upset by your answer.
You shouldn't be upset.
> I'm happy that people speak up and claim their fear with this licence, and
> no,
This is OK. They can ask questions and have a right to know why ftpmasters
accepted
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
> > myself examined the license before accepting it into non-free (which
> > is three times the usual examination,
>
> It may be three times the usual examination, but when the lice
Le Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 03:15:19PM -0500, Steve Langasek écrivait:
> 2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
> of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
> distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
> above, provided t
Le Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:29:52PM -0500, Steve Langasek écrivait:
> The latest version of libdbd-mysql-perl build-depends on
> libmysqclient-dev. I'm afraid that, although this fixed the FTBFS bug,
> it potentially renders some software in our archive non-distributable.
> Because the new libmysql
Le Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 10:19:11PM +, James Troup écrivait:
> This condition differs significantly from the Artistic license, and IMO
> is a restriction on distribution which makes it non-free. My reading
> of Raphael's footnote doesn't match my reading of this condition.
> What do others thin
[I'm not subscribed to -legal, please CC answers]
Le Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 06:20:23PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait:
> Please post the license and the translation to debian-legal.
Ok, here is it :
-=-=- french license -=-=-
SYMPA - Système de multipostage automatique
Copyright
9 matches
Mail list logo
