On 2009-04-17, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> (And I was also under the impression that Debian follows the wishes of the
> copyright holder, so it doesn't matter if this argument has any legal merit,
> just that the FSF makes it.)
Note that there's no FSF copyright code in the xapian-bindings upstream
tar
On 2009-04-17, MJ Ray wrote:
> Olly Betts wrote:
>> For reference, this is #513796 in the BTS.
>
> Will you summarise/link or should we cc?
Good question. Since I didn't Cc: the start of the thread, I'll update
the bug with a link to this thread, and summarise the
On 2009-04-17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:09:57 +0200 Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Olly Betts:
>>
>> > To summarise, php5-xapian wraps the GPLv2+ licensed Xapian library for
>> > PHP v3.01 licensed PHP5.
>>
>> The PHP license is
Hi,
For reference, this is #513796 in the BTS.
To summarise, php5-xapian wraps the GPLv2+ licensed Xapian library for
PHP v3.01 licensed PHP5. The two licences are regarded as incompatible
due to the restriction on names containing "PHP" in clause 4 of the PHP
licence. The build process doesn't
4 matches
Mail list logo
