On 6/4/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:39AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> >> Too many excuses. All inadequate.
> >>
On 6/4/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 12:18:39AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> Too many excuses. All inadequate.
>
> It is past time that the covert actions of the "small cabal"
> were openly reviewed. The license (for convenience), any
> relevant written promises from Sun (if an
On 5/22/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 10:50 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Again this logic doesn't seem to work for me. If I was offering warez
> on my server I couldn't become legal again by just removing it. My
> prior action would still get me sued, does
On 5/18/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> First off, I'm going to completely ignore the FAQ as the FAQ and the
> license both specifies that the FAQ does not have any legal validity.
Repeating frequently asked questions that have already b
abytes of RAM for web-search-cache). So I
> really do not understand the fuss about this topic.
Eh, what about (PHP) scripts used on websites?
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/9/05, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humberto Massa Guimarães <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I doubt that "people who do not wish to become legally bound to appear
> >> at the the author's home court whenever he files a frivolous lawsuit"
> >> can be meaningfully described as a
6 matches
Mail list logo
