Re: DFSG conform OSI licenses

Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: >> >the recent discussion about 'Firebird being in main' caused even more >> >confusion on my side, as the sites [1], [2] (which I consider the >> >debian-official statement wrt. which license is DFSG compliant) do not >> >list the MPL as a DFSG conform license but as DFSG-

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL

Anthony Towns wrote: >> The Project essentially told us our conclusion ??? the GFDL is not free ?= >> is wrong in the case where there are no invariant sections.=20 > > So, debian-legal is "us", leaving the rest of the project to be > "them"? Well, several of the loudest squallers over-interpretin

Re: libgsm: right to distribute

Simon Neininger wrote: > Copyright 1992, 1993, 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann, > Technische Universitaet Berlin Carsten is my thesis counsellor, I'll ask him for clarification. I have no reason to believe that distribution is not permitted, though. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSU